tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8298837746880587541.post3807595266367498526..comments2024-01-06T05:01:09.131-06:00Comments on The Defense Rests: Rewriting the pastPaul B. Kennedyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15827522954049831696noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8298837746880587541.post-76064222571934059522012-08-30T06:59:12.585-05:002012-08-30T06:59:12.585-05:00Here's the problem: Armstrong passed hundreds ...Here's the problem: Armstrong passed hundreds of drug tests but USADA wanted to impeach him with informant/witness testimony. However, if there had been one actual positive test, a hundred witnesses testifying to his clean living wouldn't save him. So snitch testimony can condemn the man but it could never vindicate him. It's a no win situation.<br /><br />After what happened to Roger Clemens, I don't blame Armstrong for refusing to go along with the witch hunt. None of his critics could match his achievements even if they were juiced to the nines. The whole process is hypocritical, media driven, and disgusts me.Gritsforbreakfasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.com