Unlike the near-circus atmosphere of his first trial in 2007, the re-trial managed to come in below the radar screen and played to a sparsely-populated courtroom.
After nearly six months of testimony, the jury deliberated for about 30 hours before announcing their verdict.
For California prosecutors, it was a rare victory over a celebrity defendant. Spector's attorneys said they may appeal the judge's decision to allow five women to testify that Mr. Spector had threatened them in the past.
Of course I think that hair-do warrants a conviction by itself.
LOL about the hairdo! However, the hairdo is not a crime; murder, on the other hand....
ReplyDeleteAnd yet the evidence is clear: Spector could not have been in the room when she shot herself and he certainly had no motive to shoot her -- quite the reverse.
ReplyDeleteIt is reported that the foreperson (who spoke to the media) was unable to explain why they voted for guilt; her response was, "We looked at the totality of the evidence." She said they ignored the scientific evidence!