These are the musings, ramblings, rantings and observations of Houston DWI Attorney Paul B. Kennedy on DWI defense, general criminal defense, philosophy and whatever else tickles his fancy.
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Celebrating the Declaration of Independence
Robb Fickman (aka The Czar) organized a live reading last year and new TCDLA President Gary Trichter has asked defense attorneys across the state to conduct live readings at the courthouse this year.
Come join HCCLA for the continuation of a new tradition.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Into the belly of the beast
Maxwell v. State, 253 S.W.3d 309 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth, 2008, pet. ref’d).
Officer may consider defendant’s refusal to do Field Sobriety Tests when determining the issue of probable cause to arrest.
Texas Dept. Of Public Safety v. Nielsen, 102 S.W. 3d 313 (Tex.App.—Beaumont, 2003, no pet.).
Substantial evidence existed of probable cause for driver’s arrest for driving while intoxicated (DWI) where police officer noticed several signs of intoxication including alcoholic odor coming from vehicle, driver’s refusal to make eye contact with officer, driver’s refusal to roll down window, driver’s response that he had consumed two to four beers when asked if he had been drinking, and driver’s refusal to take field sobriety tests. The totality of the circumstances is substantial evidence of probable cause for Nielsen’s arrest.