So, Justice Scalia thinks the time for the exclusionary rule has passed because the police are more professional now than they were "in the day?" Isn't that a better argument for the continuation, not elimination, of the rule?
Today I gave a presentation on voir dire to the Houston Municipal Justice Bar Association. It was the first time I've made a presentation to my peers. After I got over my initial nervousness, my talk went well. I figure if I can be comfortable talking to a room full of lawyers that talking to a jury panel will be that much easier.